# rtmp-hls-server vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rtmp-hls-server | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #46 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 446 | 38 965 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 353 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 42/100 for rtmp-hls-server, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, rtmp-hls-server is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 353 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rtmp-hls-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/rtmp-hls-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rtmp-hls-server.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rtmp-hls-server-vs-searxng