rtmp-hls-servervsSearXNG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rtmp-hls-server | SearXNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #46 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 446 | 38 965 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 353 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 42/100 for rtmp-hls-server, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, rtmp-hls-server is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 353 stars in 30 days).
rtmp-hls-server details →SearXNG details →
Swap a project
Keep rtmp-hls-server, compare it with
Keep SearXNG, compare it with