rtmp-hls-servervssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rtmp-hls-server | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #46 of 54 in Media Streaming | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 446 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 42/100 for rtmp-hls-server, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, rtmp-hls-server is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
rtmp-hls-server details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep rtmp-hls-server, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with