rsyslogvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rsyslog | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Logging | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 3 |
| Latest release | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
rsyslog scores 67/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
rsyslog ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
rsyslog is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
rsyslog details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep rsyslog, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with