rsyslogvsWakapi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rsyslog | Wakapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Logging | #4 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 | 4 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +30 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 11 |
| Latest release | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | 2.18.2 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
rsyslog scores 67/100 against 64/100 for Wakapi, so it is the safer default.
Wakapi ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.
If you want the quickest setup, Wakapi is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.
Wakapi is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).
rsyslog details →Wakapi details →
Swap a project
Keep rsyslog, compare it with
Keep Wakapi, compare it with