# rsyslog vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rsyslog | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Logging | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 | 56 869 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +140 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 67/100 for rsyslog, so it is the safer default.

Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rsyslog](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rsyslog-vs-typst