rsyslogvsTypesense
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rsyslog | Typesense | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Logging | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 2 343 | 27 060 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +474 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 4 |
| Latest release | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | C |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 67/100 for rsyslog, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+474 stars in 30 days).
rsyslog details →Typesense details →
Swap a project
Keep rsyslog, compare it with
Keep Typesense, compare it with