rsyslogvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rsyslog | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Logging | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 0 |
| Latest release | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
rsyslog scores 67/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
rsyslog ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.
rsyslog is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
rsyslog details →supabase-automated-self-host details →
Swap a project
Keep rsyslog, compare it with
Keep supabase-automated-self-host, compare it with