# rsspush vs Wallabag

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rsspush | Wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 4 in RSS | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 622 | 13 033 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +50 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | — | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Wallabag scores 73/100 against 42/100 for rsspush, so it is the safer default.

Wallabag ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for rsspush.

If you want the quickest setup, rsspush is easier to run; Wallabag needs more configuration.

Wallabag is growing faster right now (+50 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rsspush](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsspush) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsspush.md)
- [Wallabag](https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rsspush-vs-wallabag