# RSSerpent vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RSSerpent | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #63 of 85 in Feed Reader | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 204 | 95 319 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 357 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 41/100 for RSSerpent, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for RSSerpent.

If you want the quickest setup, RSSerpent is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 357 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RSSerpent](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsserpent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsserpent.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rsserpent-vs-stirling-pdf