# RSS Guard vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RSS Guard | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 85 in Feed Reader | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 816 | 95 273 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +53 | +2 311 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | 5.2.5 · 20 Aug 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 64/100 for RSS Guard, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for RSS Guard.

If you want the quickest setup, RSS Guard is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RSS Guard](https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-guard) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-guard.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rss-guard-vs-stirling-pdf