# rpi-mqtt-monitor vs Typesense

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rpi-mqtt-monitor | Typesense |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 27 063 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +477 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 ✓ | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Typesense scores 79/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.

rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.

If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.

Typesense is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rpi-mqtt-monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor.md)
- [Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typesense.md)

## Related comparisons

- [MeiliSearch vs Typesense](https://selfhost.directory/compare/meilisearch-vs-typesense)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rpi-mqtt-monitor-vs-typesense