# rpi-mqtt-monitor vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rpi-mqtt-monitor | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 114 255 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 546 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 8 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, rpi-mqtt-monitor is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 546 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rpi-mqtt-monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rpi-mqtt-monitor-vs-supabase