# rpi-mqtt-monitor vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rpi-mqtt-monitor | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 13 309 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +299 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.

rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rpi-mqtt-monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rpi-mqtt-monitor-vs-stash