RowfillvsTypebot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Rowfill | Typebot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Data Analysis | #1 of 6 in Chatbot |
| GitHub stars | 365 | 10 587 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +223 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Typebot scores 70/100 against 42/100 for Rowfill, so it is the safer default.
Typebot ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Rowfill.
If you want the quickest setup, Typebot is easier to run; Rowfill needs more configuration.
Typebot is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).
Rowfill details →Typebot details →
Swap a project
Keep Rowfill, compare it with
Keep Typebot, compare it with