RowfillvsSparkyFitness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Rowfill | SparkyFitness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Data Analysis | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 365 | 6 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +393 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 27 |
| Latest release | — | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
SparkyFitness scores 66/100 against 42/100 for Rowfill, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Rowfill.
If you want the quickest setup, SparkyFitness is easier to run; Rowfill needs more configuration.
SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+393 stars in 30 days).
Rowfill details →SparkyFitness details →
Swap a project
Keep Rowfill, compare it with
Keep SparkyFitness, compare it with