RowfillvsSearXNG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Rowfill | SearXNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Data Analysis | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 365 | 38 963 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 351 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 42/100 for Rowfill, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; Rowfill needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 351 stars in 30 days).
Rowfill details →SearXNG details →
Swap a project
Keep Rowfill, compare it with
Keep SearXNG, compare it with