# Rowfill vs ryot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Rowfill | ryot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Data Analysis | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 365 | 3 648 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +42 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ryot scores 63/100 against 42/100 for Rowfill, so it is the safer default.

ryot ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Rowfill.

If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; Rowfill needs more configuration.

ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Rowfill](https://selfhost.directory/project/rowfill) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rowfill.md)
- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rowfill-vs-ryot