# RomM vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RomM | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Emulation | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 14 152 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +984 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 5.4.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

RomM scores 81/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

RomM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

RomM is growing faster right now (+984 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RomM](https://selfhost.directory/project/romm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/romm.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/romm-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api