# RomM vs tobab

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RomM | tobab |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Emulation | #34 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 14 134 ✓ | 155 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +978 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 5.4.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

RomM scores 81/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.

RomM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tobab.

RomM is growing faster right now (+978 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RomM](https://selfhost.directory/project/romm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/romm.md)
- [tobab](https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/romm-vs-tobab