# Rocketship vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Rocketship | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 10 in Testing | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 182 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.43 · 18 Jan 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 43/100 for Rocketship, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Rocketship.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Rocketship needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Rocketship](https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketship) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketship.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketship-vs-tradingagents