# Rocket.Chat vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Rocket.Chat | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Instant Messaging | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 46 349 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +179 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 8.5.4 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Rocket.Chat scores 82/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Rocket.Chat ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Rocket.Chat is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Rocket.Chat is growing faster right now (+179 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketchat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketchat.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Rocket.Chat vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-windows-arm