# Rocket.Chat vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Rocket.Chat | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Instant Messaging | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 46 348 | 93 036 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 | +1 289 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | 8.5.4 · 16 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 82/100 for Rocket.Chat, so it is the safer default.

Rocket.Chat ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Rocket.Chat needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketchat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketchat.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Rocket.Chat vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-uptime-kuma