# Rocket.Chat vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Rocket.Chat | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Instant Messaging | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 46 350 | 118 043 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +180 | +5 684 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 8.5.4 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 82/100 for Rocket.Chat, so it is the safer default.

Rocket.Chat ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 684 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketchat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketchat.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Rocket.Chat vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-tradingagents