# Rocket.Chat vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Rocket.Chat | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Instant Messaging | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 46 348 ✓ | 24 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 | +787 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 8.5.4 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 82/100 for Rocket.Chat, so it is the safer default.

Rocket.Chat ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, Rocket.Chat is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+787 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketchat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketchat.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Rocket.Chat vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rocketchat-vs-temporal