# Retrom vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Retrom | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Emulation | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 2 100 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.8.4 · 14 Jun 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 58/100 for Retrom, so it is the safer default.

Retrom ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, Retrom is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

Retrom is growing faster right now (+27 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Retrom](https://selfhost.directory/project/retrom) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retrom.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retrom-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s