# Retrom vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Retrom | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Emulation | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 100 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.8.4 · 14 Jun 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Retrom scores 58/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

Retrom ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

If you want the quickest setup, Retrom is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Retrom is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Retrom](https://selfhost.directory/project/retrom) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retrom.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retrom-vs-wraft