# Retrom vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Retrom | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Emulation | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 2 100 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.8.4 · 14 Jun 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

UUSEC WAF scores 59/100 against 58/100 for Retrom, so it is the safer default.

Retrom ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

Retrom is growing faster right now (+27 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Retrom](https://selfhost.directory/project/retrom) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retrom.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retrom-vs-uusec-waf