# retroassembly vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 16 058 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +243 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+243 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap