# retroassembly vs Zealot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Zealot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #17 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 1 367 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | 6.2.2 · 25 Jul 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

retroassembly scores 56/100 against 55/100 for Zealot, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Zealot needs more configuration.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Zealot](https://selfhost.directory/project/zealot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zealot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-zealot