# retroassembly vs Yarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 4 080 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 ✓ | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Yarr scores 61/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

Yarr ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Yarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-yarr