# retroassembly vs Xray VPN OneClick

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Xray VPN OneClick |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #35 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 ✓ | 350 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 ✓ | v2.0.1 · 21 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

retroassembly scores 56/100 against 50/100 for Xray VPN OneClick, so it is the safer default.

Xray VPN OneClick ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Xray VPN OneClick needs more configuration.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Xray VPN OneClick](https://selfhost.directory/project/xray-vpn-oneclick) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xray-vpn-oneclick.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-xray-vpn-oneclick