# retroassembly vs worklenz

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | worklenz |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 3 284 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 | +102 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

worklenz scores 63/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

worklenz ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; worklenz needs more configuration.

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [worklenz](https://selfhost.directory/project/worklenz) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/worklenz.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-worklenz