# retroassembly vs Pelican Wings

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Pelican Wings |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #30 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 ✓ | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

retroassembly scores 56/100 against 50/100 for Pelican Wings, so it is the safer default.

retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Pelican Wings.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Pelican Wings needs more configuration.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Pelican Wings](https://selfhost.directory/project/wings) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wings.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-wings