# retroassembly vs Pterodactyl Wings

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Pterodactyl Wings |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #15 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 ✓ | 1 072 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v1.13.4 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pterodactyl Wings scores 63/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

Pterodactyl Wings ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Pterodactyl Wings needs more configuration.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Pterodactyl Wings](https://selfhost.directory/project/wings-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wings-2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-wings-2