# retroassembly vs Wastebin

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Wastebin |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 ✓ | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

retroassembly and Wastebin score the same (56/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Wastebin](https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-wastebin