# retroassembly vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 93 050 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 | +1 256 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-uptime-kuma