# retroassembly vs Twenty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Twenty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 60 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 | +2 595 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

Twenty ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Twenty needs more configuration.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 595 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-twenty