# retroassembly vs trusted-cgi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | trusted-cgi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #4 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 ✓ | 249 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

retroassembly scores 56/100 against 45/100 for trusted-cgi, so it is the safer default.

retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for trusted-cgi.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [trusted-cgi](https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-trusted-cgi