# retroassembly vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-tradingagents