# retroassembly vs Trac

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Trac |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #1 of 7 in Issue Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Trac scores 65/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Trac.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Trac needs more configuration.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Trac](https://selfhost.directory/project/trac) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trac.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-trac