# retroassembly vs Taskwarrior

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Taskwarrior |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #2 of 15 in Productivity |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 6 140 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v3.5.0 · 16 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Taskwarrior scores 68/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Taskwarrior.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Taskwarrior](https://selfhost.directory/project/taskwarrior) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/taskwarrior.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-taskwarrior