# retroassembly vs Super Productivity

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Super Productivity |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 23 250 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 | +1 010 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 010 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Super Productivity](https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-super-productivity