# retroassembly vs supabase-automated-self-host

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | supabase-automated-self-host |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 ✓ | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

retroassembly scores 56/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-supabase-automated-self-host