# retroassembly vs subarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | subarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #79 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 ✓ | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v2.7.24 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

retroassembly scores 56/100 against 48/100 for subarr, so it is the safer default.

subarr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; subarr needs more configuration.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [subarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-subarr