# retroassembly vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 13 309 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 | +299 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 ✓ | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-stash