# retroassembly vs speech-to-phrase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | speech-to-phrase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 ✓ | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 ✓ | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

retroassembly scores 56/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.

retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [speech-to-phrase](https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-speech-to-phrase