# retroassembly vs Retrom

> Two self-hosted [Emulation projects](https://selfhost.directory/emulation), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | retroassembly | Retrom |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 58/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #3 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 2 100 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 ✓ | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 ✓ | v0.8.4 · 14 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Retrom scores 58/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

Retrom ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Retrom needs more configuration.

retroassembly is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)
- [Retrom](https://selfhost.directory/project/retrom) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retrom.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retroassembly-vs-retrom