# Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audio Processing | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 38 932 ✓ | 16 649 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +419 ✓ | +250 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.3.260718 · 21 Jul 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI scores 77/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/retrieval-based-voice-conversion-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retrieval-based-voice-conversion-webui.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retrieval-based-voice-conversion-webui-vs-trigger