# Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI vs sentry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI | sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audio Processing | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 38 933 | 45 679 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +420 | +840 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.3.260718 · 21 Jul 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 77/100 for Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/retrieval-based-voice-conversion-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retrieval-based-voice-conversion-webui.md)
- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/retrieval-based-voice-conversion-webui-vs-sentry